Re: Implementation evidence - Producers

Hi Dan,

I cannot speak for the entire SDW group but creating synergies between 
SOSA/SSN and schema.org was one of our design goals (for SOSA). So, at 
least as far as I am concerned, I would be very happy if you would look 
into what we did for SOSA.

Best,
Jano

On 06/06/2017 05:19 PM, Dan Brickley wrote:
>
> I'd be happy to explore that, but it would be good to have some (even 
> informal) encouragement from the SDW WG that this would be a welcome 
> development. We did something similar with a DCAT-based Dataset design 
> a while ago and it seems that we inadvertently caused some frustration 
> as it was seen as a fork. It would be a pity to try to adopt a design 
> based on SOSA (or SOSA/SSN) and for that to be seen in a similar way. 
> Do you think the WG would welcome such an effort?
>
> Dan
>
> On 7 June 2017 at 00:37, Armin Haller <armin.haller@anu.edu.au 
> <mailto:armin.haller@anu.edu.au>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dan,
>
>     SSN http://w3c.github.io/sdw/ssn/ is now in rec-track and we are
>     to collect implementation evidences in the next 4 weeks. In fact,
>     we need to show demonstrated use in at least two producer
>     implementations and two consumer implementations, with producer
>     implementations, according to our interpretation of the Director’s
>     words meaning that there needs to be two ontologies that extend
>     each term of SOSA/SSN.
>
>     You indicated earlier in the working group that you would likely
>     take the simple SOSA core and integrate all or parts of it in
>     Schema.org. Would that be something you could kick off in the next
>     4 weeks with maybe a Change request to schema.org <http://schema.org>?
>
>     Cheers,
>     Armin
>
>


-- 
Krzysztof Janowicz

Geography Department, University of California, Santa Barbara
4830 Ellison Hall, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4060

Email: jano@geog.ucsb.edu
Webpage: http://geog.ucsb.edu/~jano/
Semantic Web Journal: http://www.semantic-web-journal.net