RE: Temporal reference system

s/needs to/should/



This would be more consistent with ISO/IEC conventions for the 'normative language' used to express formal requirements [1]. IETF has a slightly different set [2]. Does W3C have a preferred usage?



Perhaps a sweep of the document to regularize this through all the requirements as stated.



[1] http://www.iec.ch/standardsdev/resources/draftingpublications/writing_editing/directives/requirements_recommendations.htm

[2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-peterson-informational-normativity-01


Simon Cox | Research Scientist
CSIRO Land and Water
PO Box 56, Highett Vic 3190, Australia
Tel +61 3 9252 6342<tel:%2B61%203%209252%206342> | Mob +61 403 302 672<tel:%2B61%20403%20302%20672>
simon.cox@csiro.au<https://vic.owa.csiro.au/owa/redir.aspx?C=Y8HMKTuUBkmbM97NjtDx5lGOnwxj1c9IdyRdGXbcQ8yykNtSsGHlgXUbOJN1bdSmnc9NFxd8E0M.&URL=mailto%3asimon.cox%40csiro.au> | http://people.csiro.au/C/S/Simon-Cox

________________________________
From: Frans Knibbe [frans.knibbe@geodan.nl]
Sent: Saturday, 6 June 2015 12:40 AM
To: SDW WG Public List
Cc: Andrea Perego; Ed Parsons; Alejandro Llaves
Subject: Re: Temporal reference system

Hello,

Is everyone happy with the way the requirement is phrased now?

"If a temporal reference is used, the description of the temporal reference system (e.g. Unix date, Gregorian Calendar, Japanese Imperial Calendar, Carbon Date, Geological Date) needs to be referenceable online."

If not, we need to create a new issue and relate it to the requirement in the UCR document.

Regards,
Frans



2015-06-05 1:23 GMT+02:00 <Simon.Cox@csiro.au<mailto:Simon.Cox@csiro.au>>:

... (moving from requirements into potential solution space) referencing a description of the TRS is what is described in my proposed (backward compatible) amendment to OWL-Time.

See http://def.seegrid.csiro.au/ontology/time/new and http://www.semantic-web-journal.net/content/time-ontology-extended-non-gregorian-calendar-applications-0


Simon Cox | Research Scientist
CSIRO Land and Water
PO Box 56, Highett Vic 3190, Australia
Tel +61 3 9252 6342<tel:%2B61%203%209252%206342> | Mob +61 403 302 672<tel:%2B61%20403%20302%20672>
simon.cox@csiro.au<https://vic.owa.csiro.au/owa/redir.aspx?C=Y8HMKTuUBkmbM97NjtDx5lGOnwxj1c9IdyRdGXbcQ8yykNtSsGHlgXUbOJN1bdSmnc9NFxd8E0M.&URL=mailto%3asimon.cox%40csiro.au> | http://people.csiro.au/C/S/Simon-Cox

________________________________
From: Alejandro Llaves [allaves@fi.upm.es<mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es>]
Sent: Tuesday, 2 June 2015 9:54 PM
To: Andrea Perego
Cc: Ed Parsons; Frans Knibbe; SDW WG Public List
Subject: Re: Temporal reference system

Ok, I will rephrase the requirement and add some examples.

Alejandro

On 2 June 2015 at 00:19, Andrea Perego <andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu<mailto:andrea.perego@jrc.ec.europa.eu>> wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Ed Parsons <eparsons@google.com<mailto:eparsons@google.com>> wrote:
> I like the approach of treating this in the same way as CRS, if a temporal
> reference is used, the description of that system needs to be referenceable
> online.

+1 also from me.

Andrea




--
Alejandro Llaves

Ontology Engineering Group (OEG)

Artificial Intelligence Department

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid

Avda. Montepríncipe s/n

Boadilla del Monte, 28660 Madrid, Spain


http://www.oeg-upm.net/index.php/phd/325-allaves


allaves@fi.upm.es<mailto:allaves@fi.upm.es>



--
Frans Knibbe
Geodan
President Kennedylaan 1
1079 MB Amsterdam (NL)

T +31 (0)20 - 5711 347
E frans.knibbe@geodan.nl<mailto:frans.knibbe@geodan.nl>
www.geodan.nl<http://www.geodan.nl>
disclaimer<http://www.geodan.nl/disclaimer>

Received on Friday, 5 June 2015 15:18:24 UTC