- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2015 13:35:47 -0500
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 2/7/15 6:50 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > It seems clear to me that you can keep using an `enum` and if need be > use prose to say "This specifications adds these values to that enum". You actually can't right now without violating other specifications is the point. > It seems you are only looking > for WebIDL syntax to express adding values to an enum. Right. > That does not look like a problem to me. It's a problem for argument enums. It's not a problem, imo, for return values... -Boris
Received on Monday, 9 February 2015 18:36:24 UTC