- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 21:45:11 -0500
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "Mark S. Miller" <erights@google.com>, Travis Leithead <travis.leithead@microsoft.com>, Domenic Denicola <domenic@domenicdenicola.com>, "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
On 1/14/15 8:56 PM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > What are the odds that the behavior observable by web pages can actually > be defined sanely such that ES invariants and compatibility requirements > are satisfied? My personal best estimate is about 30% chance for the one such definition we have so far being web compatible. But this is mostly based on gut feeling. > https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27128#c15 > indicates, as I understand it, the odds may be quite good. In that case, > looking for a volunteer to come up with a proposal might be a good next > step. We have a proposal. It's at https://github.com/domenic/window-proxy-spec I have an implementation that I've been trying to land in Firefox for a few weeks. I had to fix a bunch of our tests, then restrict the change to web pages because it breaks various extensions. I'm pretty hopeful that I can at least get it to the point where I can try doing some web compat testing... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1107443 for those who want to follow along. -Boris
Received on Thursday, 15 January 2015 02:45:42 UTC