- From: <bugzilla@jessica.w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 10:53:25 +0000
- To: public-script-coord@w3.org
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=27749
Bug ID: 27749
Summary: "DOMException constructor object" as IDL
Product: WebAppsWG
Version: unspecified
Hardware: PC
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: WebIDL
Assignee: cam@mcc.id.au
Reporter: simonp@opera.com
QA Contact: public-webapps-bugzilla@w3.org
CC: mike@w3.org, public-script-coord@w3.org
https://heycam.github.io/webidl/#es-DOMException-constructor-object
[[
DOMException constructor object
]]
Why is DOMException specified as prose instead of as IDL (with prose for things
not expressable in IDL, if anything)? Having it as IDL has the advantage of
being easier to test and maybe also implement.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2015 10:53:27 UTC