Re: Figuring out easier readonly interfaces from Boris Zbarsky on 2013-10-02 (public-script-coord@w3.org from October to December 2013)

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 17:28:34 -0400
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>
Message-ID: <524C9002.1060504@mit.edu>

On 10/2/13 5:25 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote:
> I don't think so, but I could be wrong.

I think you're wrong.

> I think that still ends up
> trying to do a "set" on the proxy

It doesn't.  It calls some function with thisArg set to the proxy.  What 
happens after that is based on the definition of that method, not 
anything in the ES spec.  And that definition would presumably live in 
WebIDL.

-Boris

Received on Wednesday, 2 October 2013 21:29:07 UTC