W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2013

Re: Promises: final steps

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Sun, 8 Sep 2013 18:06:19 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnb78gN+u=WY54obQ-NCHMTXAvwXWQizp_EXyANsYfjcjCtFQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net>
Cc: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "www-dom@w3.org" <www-dom@w3.org>, es-discuss <es-discuss@mozilla.org>
(Added back the other lists.)

On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 3:58 AM, Brendan Eich <brendan@secure.meer.net> wrote:
> Let's put done back in. It's the right thing.

Given what has been said thus far
https://github.com/domenic/promises-unwrapping/issues/19 my
inclination is still to leave it out initially and give a version
without done() six months to a year to mature. Not having done() can
make promises harder to debug in the short term, but adding done() is
trivial to do later. And given the lack of native promise
implementations to date there's no way for us to test the done()-less
design without trying it first.


-- 
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 8 September 2013 17:07:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:37:50 UTC