Re: XMLDocument and Document.location and WebIDL spec don't play nice together

On 12/13/12 6:00 PM, Cameron McCormack wrote:
> On 14/12/12 7:20 AM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
>> Actually, more like:
>>
>>    If interface A inherits from interface B, and either B or one of its
>>    consequential interfaces has a [Unforgeable]-annotated attribute,
>>    then A and all its consequential interfaces MUST NOT have an
>>    attribute with the same identifier.
>
> Agree:
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/2006/webapi/WebIDL/Overview.xml.diff?r1=1.598;r2=1.599;f=h

Actually, we might want s/attribute/member/ in that last line or 
something.  Don't want to shadow an unforgeable attribute with an 
operation either, right?

-Boris

Received on Thursday, 13 December 2012 23:36:23 UTC