- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:36:10 +0200
- To: "Anne van Kesteren" <annevk@annevk.nl>, "Robin Berjon" <robin@w3.org>
- Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012 00:14:59 +0200, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote: > On 26/10/2012 12:59 , Anne van Kesteren wrote: >> I think we should introduce UTFString to make this conversion explicit >> and not bother tons of standards with boilerplate language that is >> easily forgotten. > > [Bikeshed Advisory] > > In which case can we just call it "string"? I think it's better if it's clear that it's only supposed to be used where the overhead of ensuring Unicode cleanness is necessary, which "string" doesn't communicate. UTFString seems a bit clearer; DOMStringWithoutLoneSurrogates is clearer still but quite long. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Sunday, 28 October 2012 23:36:49 UTC