W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: Why do WebIDL dictionary members not have [TreatNullAs], [TreatUndefinedAs] apply to them?

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@annevk.nl>
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 07:48:54 +0200
Message-ID: <CADnb78j_Hu==VQ6uz+P1yrBcO8um_nfTx8mGMKNYcJJN2ewy3A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, public-script-coord@w3.org
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote:
> I guess we could allow that.  I feel though like we shouldn't be encouraging
> use of [TreatNullAs] and [TreatUndefinedAs] in new APIs.

Agreed. Is there a use case?


-- 
Anne — Opera Software
http://annevankesteren.nl/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 7 June 2012 05:49:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:06 UTC