W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > April to June 2012

Re: WebIDL test suite time

From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2012 14:18:49 -0400
Message-ID: <4F8F0589.9020807@mit.edu>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
On 4/18/12 2:12 PM, Marcos Caceres wrote:
> I guess this really applies to Section 4 in the spec (ECMAScript binding). The rest can't be tested because the spec does not really define WebIDL Parsers as a conformance class (or it's targeted at spec Editors).

Though one could write an actual parser, throw various WebIDL at it, and 
see if it's valid....

That will need to happen anyway, for the whole "two implementations" bit.

> This could be made trivial is the Editor marked up the RFC2119 keywords. For example:
>
> <p>The foo<em class="ct">MUST</em>  do something.</p>

Not exactly.  A single MUST can correspond to a long list of testable 
assertions.

-Boris
Received on Wednesday, 18 April 2012 18:19:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:06 UTC