On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 06:32:49 +0100, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> wrote: > It's the process we use over in the SVG WG, as I understand that > Disposition of Comments documents produced for the transition from LCWD > to CR are more convincing when there are indications of whether > commentors were happy with the resolution of the issues they raised. > Probably this is more important for rejections, though, so perhaps it's > not strictly necessary here. Yeah, when there is disagreement it makes sense. But when everyone is agreed I think it increases the noise unnecessarily (and it's extra work). -- Anne van Kesteren http://annevankesteren.nl/Received on Friday, 23 December 2011 11:55:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:05 UTC