W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

RE: Vestiges of [Supplemental]

From: Travis Leithead <Travis.Leithead@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2011 16:20:26 +0000
To: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
CC: "public-script-coord@w3.org" <public-script-coord@w3.org>, "ian@hixie.ch" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Jonas Sicking (jonas@sicking.cc)" <jonas@sicking.cc>, "simonp@opera.com" <simonp@opera.com>
Message-ID: <9768D477C67135458BF978A45BCF9B3834CD4D1B@TK5EX14MBXW604.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
>From: Cameron McCormack [mailto:cam@mcc.id.au], Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2011 3:53 AM
>On 8/09/11 9:42 AM, Travis Leithead wrote:
>> This appears to be one of the only cases for [CopyInheritedPrototype] in
>WebIDL, and if we don't want/need this to be available anywhere else, I'd
>prefer not to have to support it.
>
>Indeed.  I've removed [CopyInheritedPrototype] now.
>
>Travis, I'm interpreting this as an "accept" resolution to your comment
>LC-34 (request for [CopyInheritedPrototype] use cases).
>
>Ian, I'm interpreting your original mail in this thread as a request to
>add support for the use case that [CopyInheritedPrototype] would've
>solved, which this is a rejection of.
>
>If both of you could indicate whether this is response is satisfactory,
>that would be appreciated.


This is acceptable resolution to my comment.


>Thanks,
>
>Cameron

Received on Thursday, 8 September 2011 16:21:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC