W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: Removing 'caller' from WebIDL

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2011 09:03:23 +0200
To: "Brendan Eich" <brendan@mozilla.org>, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Jonas Sicking" <jonas@sicking.cc>, public-script-coord@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.v00lvxtc64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:08:59 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> I'm open to removing "caller" from Web IDL if people think that's best,  
> and I'd be happy to suggest wording to be added to the HTML spec to  
> handle the cases that do need to remain.

I think we should keep it in IDL because it needs to be implemented, but  
if we do not want to spread it lets just name it "legacycaller" instead  
(and likewise prefix all other problematic constructs with "legacy").


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Tuesday, 30 August 2011 07:04:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC