W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > July to September 2011

Re: [WebIDL] Handling undefined in Overload Resolution Algorithm

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 10:44:12 +0200
To: "Lachlan Hunt" <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>, "Cameron McCormack" <cam@mcc.id.au>
Cc: public-script-coord@w3.org, jonas@sicking.cc, bzbarsky@mit.edu, allen@wirfs-brock.com
Message-ID: <op.vzok7yet64w2qv@annevk-macbookpro.local>
On Thu, 04 Aug 2011 02:50:38 +0200, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  
wrote:
> Let me know your thoughts.

In general this sounds good to me. Has anyone tested legacy APIs like the  
open() method of XMLHttpRequest to see if you get the same? I sort of  
thought undefined was passed through, but maybe I misremember.


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Thursday, 4 August 2011 08:45:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:04 UTC