Ms2ger: > In any case, we can't use NamedNodeMap, as Attrs aren't Nodes. Didn’t realise that had changed. > However, we don't expect many pages to use attributes in other ways > than by looping through them. In particular, even if we didn't use > the WebIDL array type, we would replace NamedNodeMap with something > like > > interface AttrList { > getter(unsigned long index); > }; > > unless that breaks a significant number of sites. I certainly don't > expect to change the specification until it has been implemented by > a mainstream browser. >From a quick search there seems to be uses of the methods on Element.attributes: http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=attributes.item+lang%3Ajavascript http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=attributes.getNamedItem+lang%3Ajavascript http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=attributes.setNamedItem+lang%3Ajavascript http://www.google.com/codesearch?q=attributes.removeNamedItem+lang%3Ajavascript Less so for the NS versions. I don’t know if that counts as significant. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/Received on Tuesday, 31 May 2011 22:21:45 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:03 UTC