W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-script-coord@w3.org > October to December 2009

Naming for custom/specialized extended attributes?

From: Dimitry Golubovsky <golubovsky@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2009 23:15:13 -0400
Message-ID: <bcba51a0910062015w3fffe7b1y3b0722fe1a8119fd@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-script-coord@w3.org
Hi,

Not sure if this was discussed here earlier:

if I need to define extended attributes specific to a certain language
binding for WebIDL (neither ECMAscript nor Java*) and meaningless for
any other language binding, is there any rule to name them so future
implementations of WebIDL tools not specific to my language will just
silently ignore them without conflict?

Thanks.

----------------------
* in my case this is a Haskell-based EDSL, but this question may arise
for any other language as well.

-- 
Dimitry Golubovsky

Anywhere on the Web
Received on Wednesday, 7 October 2009 03:15:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 8 May 2013 19:30:02 UTC