- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 15:21:35 +0200
- To: Arthur Barstow <art.barstow@nokia.com>
- Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>, public-script-coord <public-script-coord@w3.org>, Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>, Mike Smith <mike@w3.org>, Charles McCathieNevile <chaals@opera.com>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
On Sep 30, 2009, at 14:27 , Arthur Barstow wrote: > On Sep 30, 2009, at 8:16 AM, ext Robin Berjon wrote: > We should probably seek input from the Team on the actual rules on >>> this. >> >> Yup. Doug? Mike? > > We had a related thread a few weeks ago and Ian Jacobs provided some > input: > > [admin] Spec dependencies and advancing a spec > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2009JulSep/ > 0819.html Ah thanks, missed that! So basically it need to be reported but there are no rules. But presumably it needs to be reported because it is grounds for refusal... I guess that TWI makes use of WebIDL that is trivial enough that we can make the case it won't change. So that probably keeps WebApps in the clear for a while. We'll see how it goes for DAP, it's too early to tell. -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:22:05 UTC