public-scholarlyhtml@w3.org from October 2017 by author

Johannes Wilm

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)

Mike Perlman

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)

Peter (pt) Sefton

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Tuesday, 17 October)

Sarven Capadisli

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)
• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Thursday, 19 October)

sebastien

• Re: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Monday, 16 October)

Stian Soiland-Reyes

• RE: html for scholarly communication: RASH, Scholarly HTML or Dokieli? (Tuesday, 17 October)

Last message date: Thursday, 19 October 2017 15:54:36 UTC