Re: Proposing Article

Jeff - on many web sites that include DOIs, the DOI is there to be 
clicked on by humans. Will treating the DOI as a URI value to "sameAs" 
provide the clickable link as well? (Maybe an example would help.)

kc

On 1/14/14, 7:14 AM, Young,Jeff (OR) wrote:
> I don't see how it can be a matter of interpretation. Here's the data that the DOI Linked Data delivers:
>
> http://bit.ly/1dsJhOF
>
> This makes it clear that the DOI URI identifies the article, not the content-negotiated description of the article (which is located at this URI):
>
> http://data.crossref.org/10.1080%2F01639374.2012.682254
>
> Jeff
>
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Karen Coyle [mailto:kcoyle@kcoyle.net]
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2014 9:57 AM
>> To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
>> Subject: Re: Proposing Article
>>
>> I agree that it is a matter of interpretation, and that is because the
>> DOI itself can be ambiguous.
>>
>> kc
>>
>> On 1/14/14, 6:48 AM, Wallis,Richard wrote:
>>> Good point.
>>>
>>> I suppose the schema:url property would be expected to be a link to
>>> the 'thing', whereas a doi url links you to a description of the
>>> article which is the sameAs the description we are building in our
>> examples.
>>>
>>> I presume in some cases that the URI would be the same (for the
>>> article text and the description) in others it would be different.
>>> Personally I would lean towards using schema:sameAs in at least some
>> of our examples.
>>>
>>> ~Richard
>>>
>>> On 14 Jan 2014, at 14:13, Young,Jeff (OR) <jyoung@oclc.org
>>> <mailto:jyoung@oclc.org>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It seems to me that the DOI should be schema:sameAs rather than
>>>> schema:url.
>>>> I notice that the schema:author/publisher/about are treated as text
>>>> strings sometimes and blank node typed entities in others. Perhaps
>>>> this was intentional?
>>>> Other than that, it looks good.
>>>> Jeff
>>>> *From:*Wallis,Richard [mailto:Richard.Wallis@oclc.org]
>>>> *Sent:*Tuesday, January 14, 2014 6:51 AM
>>>> *To:*public-schemabibex@w3.org <mailto:public-schemabibex@w3.org>
>>>> *Subject:*Proposing Article
>>>> Hi and Happy New Year!
>>>> A simple one to start the conversation in 2014.
>>>> Can I have +/- 1's for submitting the Article proposal
>>>> <http://www.w3.org/community/schemabibex/wiki/Article> to the
>>>> public-vocabs list.
>>>> The only change I would make is to it's name which I think should be
>>>> "Periodicals, Articles & Multi-volume Works"
>>>> ~Richard
>>>
>>
>> --
>> Karen Coyle
>> kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
>> m: 1-510-435-8234
>> skype: kcoylenet
>
>
>

-- 
Karen Coyle
kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net
m: 1-510-435-8234
skype: kcoylenet

Received on Tuesday, 14 January 2014 18:40:30 UTC