W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-schemabibex@w3.org > February 2014

Re: Schemabibex Group entering a different phase

From: Niklas Lindström <lindstream@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:37:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CADjV5jduLQrnE2nhjwxSXfx4st+N+wrw3YprbPmKXtcaqVvzYw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wallis,Richard" <Richard.Wallis@oclc.org>, "public-schemabibex@w3.org" <public-schemabibex@w3.org>
That's a good question.

I am personally interested in a very specific issue: there is a "missing
base class" for Painting and Photograph (i.e. Image or Picture, to cover
all kinds of other forms like drawings and digital imagery). I was going to
just suggest that on the public vocabs list - but perhaps others here have
similar needs and would like to help out in creating a more fleshed out
proposal? (Which is probably more likely to gain traction in a near future.)

(There are at least some creative work relationships that I've needed in
conjunction with this - such as a revisionOf property.)


On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Thad Guidry <thadguidry@gmail.com> wrote:

> I do have 1 thought.  Towards the wider scope of GLAM, in general.
> Specifically, I am wondering if the Schemabibex Group has/is interested in
> trying to assist with another bib focus for Art (items in a collection).
> My question is... are all the pieces in place for describing bibliographic
> resources towards those items in a collection of Art ?
> Or does the Schemaibibex Group think that other groups have more leverage
> and should let them handle work on that ?
> Curious,
> --
> -Thad
> +ThadGuidry <https://www.google.com/+ThadGuidry>
> Thad on LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/thadguidry/>
Received on Thursday, 20 February 2014 15:38:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:22:23 UTC