- From: Karen Coyle <kcoyle@kcoyle.net>
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2013 10:42:46 -0700
- To: public-schemabibex@w3.org
On 10/19/13 2:07 PM, Dan Scott wrote: > > > > Agreed. Perhaps my fault was in not publishing a complete, ideal example > that would demonstrate branch relationships, geographic coordinates, > contact info, addresses, etc, where each library had its own URL that > contained that structured data so that we could link to those pages > rather than falling back to Text values. But that would force us to > solve all possible problems first before publishing something that > should work for the most common use cases. I agree that getting the full location information is a stretch. In any catalog displays that I have seen there is no immediate link between the catalog and the full library information, which is usually available on the library's web page. I have no idea where this is internally in the various ILSs in existence. I'd settle just for making clear what the superordinate library or library system is. Presumably that information shows in the header area of the web page for human eyes. In some cases it will be obvious from the domain name, but not always - there are hosted systems that don't have their own domain, although they may have their own URL (http://sccl.bibliocommons.com). kc > > I was assuming that the group would mentally fill in the gaps, similar > to how most of the existing schema.org <http://schema.org> examples > reflect only a subset of what is possible and ideal. > -- Karen Coyle kcoyle@kcoyle.net http://kcoyle.net m: 1-510-435-8234 skype: kcoylenet
Received on Sunday, 20 October 2013 17:43:16 UTC