- From: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 13:39:23 -0400
- To: "public-lod@w3.org" <public-lod@w3.org>, "public-rww@w3.org" <public-rww@w3.org>, "public-webid@w3.org" <public-webid@w3.org>, "dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <dbpedia-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>
- Message-ID: <514F3A4B.8000301@openlinksw.com>
All,
Here is a key HTTP enhancement from Hypertext Transfer Protocol
(HTTP/1.1): Semantics and Content note from IETF [1].
"
4. If the response has a Content-Location header field and its
field-value is a reference to a URI different from the effective
request URI, then the sender asserts that the payload is a
representation of the resource identified by the Content-Location
field-value. However, such an assertion cannot be trusted unless
it can be verified by other means (not defined by HTTP).
"
Implications:
This means that when hashless (aka. slash) HTTP URIs are used to denote
entities, a client can use value from the Content-Location response
header to distinguish a URI that denote an Entity Description Document
(Descriptor) distinct from the URI of the Entity Described by said
document. Thus, if a client de-references the URI
<http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama> and it gets a 200 OK from the
server combined with <http://dbpedia.org/page/Barack_Obama> in the
Content-Location response header, the client (user agent) can infer the
following:
1. <http://dbpedia.org/resource/Barack_Obama> denotes the real-world
entity 'Barack Obama' .
2. <http://dbpedia.org/page/Barack_Obama> denotes the Web Document that
describes real-world entity 'Barack Obama' -- by virtue of the fact that
the server has explicitly *identified* said resource via the
Content-Location header .
Basically, the Toucan Affair [2][3][4] has now been incorporated into
HTTP thereby providing an alternative to 303 redirection which has
troubled/challenged many folks trying to exploit Linked Data via
hashless HTTP URIs.
Implementations:
As per my comments in the Toucan Affair thread, our ODE [5] Linked Data
client has always supported this heuristic. In addition, I am going
propose implementing this heuristic in DBpedia which will simply have
the net effect of not sending a 303 to user agents that look-up URIs in
this particular Linked Data space.
Linked Data Client implementation suggestions:
I encourage clients to support this heuristic in addition to 303 with
regards to Linked Data URI disambiguation. Implementation costs are
minimal while the upside extremely high re., Linked Data comprehension,
appreciation, and adoption.
Links:
1. http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-22#page-15 .
2. http://blog.iandavis.com/2010/11/04/is-303-really-necessary/ -- Is
303 Really Necessary post by Ian Davis.
3. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-lod/2010Nov/0090.html --
mailing list thread .
4.
http://linkeddata.uriburner.com/about/html/http/iandavis.com/2010/303/toucan
-- example of heuristic handling .
5. http://ode.openlinksw.com -- ODE Linked Data consumer service,
bookmarklets, and cross-browser extensions.
6. http://bit.ly/YxW21k -- Illustrating Semiotic Triangle using
DBpedia's Linked Data URIs .
--
Regards,
Kingsley Idehen
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen
Attachments
- application/pkcs7-signature attachment: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
Received on Sunday, 24 March 2013 17:39:48 UTC