W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > October 2012

Re: Activity Pingback

From: Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:21:02 +0200
Cc: Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu>, Read-Write-Web <public-rww@w3.org>, public-webid <public-webid@w3.org>
Message-Id: <6940BDF6-A25B-4CC0-92F6-9CAA5235329A@bblfish.net>
To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>

On 13 Oct 2012, at 14:17, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 13 October 2012 13:25, Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu> wrote:
> On 10/13/12 13:22, Henry Story wrote:
> 
> On 13 Oct 2012, at 12:52, Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com
> <mailto:melvincarvalho@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 13 October 2012 00:10, Andrei Sambra <andrei@fcns.eu
> <mailto:andrei@fcns.eu>> wrote:
> 
>     On 10/12/12 22:20, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> 
>         [snip]
> 
>     Henry uses my-profile.eu <http://my-profile.eu/> for pingback
> 
>     delivery. However, your ping was not addressed to him but to
>     yourself. At least that's what I can tell my looking up the ping
>     in the database. This is the source URI:
>     http://melvincarvalho/likes, and this is the destination URI:
>     http://melvincarvalho/likes. Are you sure you're doing it right? :)
> 
> 
> Thanks Andrei, I resent the form
> 
> Thanks I received the ping in my-profile. But there was not a lot of
> info. I am not sure where the seeAlso is, and I think it would help a
> lot if your robot used WebID when sending the info :-) ( that should be
> easy to set up btw ).
> 
> 
> I've checked it too. Melvin used his webid to send the pingback, but I suspect that he uses RDFa for his profile, so my-profile couldn't parse it (no RDFa support). That's why you're also seeing Anonymous and no picture.
> 
> Yes, I'm using RDFa so just a little bug.  Perhaps I should serve turtle too, would that help?

Perhaps we should remove RDFa from the spec for the moment. We currently have 
in section 2.2 
http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/spec/#publishing-the-webid-profile-document

"the document must be published at least in one of RDFa [XHTML-RDFA] or RDF/XML [RDF-SYNTAX-GRAMMAR]"

If the RDFa parsers out there are not stable enough out there, then it is no good misleading 
people into using it. I am not sure I even have an RDFa 1.1 parser in java yet....

Henry 


>  
> 
> Andrei
> 
> 
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
> 
> 
> 

Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/




Received on Saturday, 13 October 2012 12:21:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 13 October 2012 12:21:45 GMT