W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rww@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Adding an app to a profile

From: Andrei Sambra <andrei.sambra@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 09:19:26 -0500
Message-ID: <CAFG79ehG=iqDmJvDyZrDxEa+MAFShsQUKqwpFUa0vba=iK093g@mail.gmail.com>
Cc: public-rww <public-rww@w3.org>
Hello all,

So it seems that in the end we still need a vocabulary to convey that we
the user of a certain application. With the risk of hijacking this thread,
I would like to suggest that we also look for a way of describing what an
app is capable of.

For example:
* does it allow users to create a WebID account
* does it support WebID authn
* does it allow users to send messages
* does it offer a public/private Wall
* etc.

Andrei

On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:09 AM, ☮ elf Pavlik ☮ <
perpetual-tripper@wwelves.org> wrote:

> Excerpts from Kingsley Idehen's message of 2012-11-29 12:55:20 +0000:
> > On 11/28/12 7:22 PM, Melvin Carvalho wrote:
> > >
> > > so how about plink : uses ?
> > >
> > > but then again I could say I use public transport, but that doesnt
> > > indicate that it is a webapp ...
> >
> > So in your profile document you can state:
> >
> >
> > <#i> <#use> <SomeApp>.
> > <SomeApp> a <#application> .
> > <#application> owl:equivalentClass <SomeSharedOntologyClass> .
> >
> > # or
> >
> > <#application> rdfs:subClassOf <SomeSharedOntologyClass> .
> >
> > etc..
> >
> > Just do what you would do in the real world with natural language.
> > Describe the world as you see it and then expand to the broader world
> > via connections.
>
> do you have recommendations of where to discuss choosing some common
> vocabularies for modeling certain domains?
>
> this website looks like a great reference but i don't find any space for
> open community interaction there :(
> http://lov.okfn.org/dataset/lov/ (editors in cc)
>
>
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:20:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:20:17 GMT