On 21 Nov 2012, at 17:32, Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com> wrote: > On 11/21/12 11:08 AM, Henry Story wrote: >> Sorry I mistyped >> >> [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP(s) hash uri >> [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP(s) hash uri >> [3] a WebID MUST be an HTTP(s) uri > > [1] a WebID MUST be a an HTTP(s) hash uri > [2] a WebID SHOULD be an HTTP(s) hash uri > [3] a WebID MUST be an HTTP(s) uri > [4] a WebID SHOULD be a an HTTP(s) uri . I have the following up here: http://www.w3.org/2005/Incubator/webid/wiki/WebID_Definition/hash It was my feeling that 4 would allow for non-http URIs and that this is not part of this debate, that having been settled last week, and at TPAC I think pretty consistently. So for the moment I think one has to fill in the arguments. > > -- > > Regards, > > Kingsley Idehen > Founder & CEO > OpenLink Software > Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com > Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen > Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen > Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about > LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen > > > > > Social Web Architect http://bblfish.net/
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2012 16:36:20 UTC