Re: http-update

On 3/16/12 4:45 PM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
> :) ...AND talk about it...
>
> there's another thing that came to mind when last
> created some stuff with respect to http-update :
>
> change-sets
>
> are these of interest to the rww group?

Yes, of course. This is critical to the Data Wiki concept. Ultimately, 
all this rww effort is going to Data Wiki as fundamental Web app. 
functionality.

A Data Wiki delivers on the goals of saying anything, about anything, 
from wherever, whenever. It also handles the provenance requirements 
that constitute graphs that represent conversations about data etc..

We have to make "he said and she said" fun and useful, at InterWeb 
scales :-)

Kingsley
>
> wkr turnguard
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Kingsley Idehen"<kidehen@openlinksw.com>
> To: public-rww@w3.org
> Sent: Friday, March 16, 2012 9:37:26 PM
> Subject: Re: http-update
>
> On 3/16/12 4:28 PM, Jürgen Jakobitsch wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> just as a starter - do get the discussion a little livelier..
>>
>> 1. is everybody aware of this document [1]. are there some
>> known issues with said document? i'm asking this with
>> respect to the question if it would be considered a
>> good idea to get some usecases going based on (or as
>> an extension of) said document.
>>
>>
>> wkr turnguard
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/sparql11-http-rdf-update/
>>
> Virtuoso supports this protocol. Coming to think of it, we haven't said
> zilch about that, even as part of today's VOS release :-(
>
> RWW supporters should look to the following protocols:
>
> 1. basic HTTP
> 2. WebDAV
> 3. SPARQL Update
> 4. SPARQL Graph Store Protocol.
>
> At this point we support 1-4 .
>


-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen 
Founder&  CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter/Identi.ca handle: @kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/112399767740508618350/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen