W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org > August 2005

Draft charter: Data expression sublanguage?

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:25:59 +0100
Message-ID: <430DC6E7.2030308@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: public-rule-workshop-discuss@w3.org

The draft charter calls for compatibility with both XML data and RDF data. 
One the face of it this requires a common data model and query language 
across XML and RDF. For example, it would have to deal with how XML data 
with embedded RDF/XML should be interpreted. That seems like quite a large 
task to have as a subtask of the WG.

Perhaps this is a smaller problem than it appears?

Perhaps a narrowing of focus of the WG would break the symmetry?

A third option would be to say "yes, that's a non-trivial task but it would 
be worth doing". In that case might it make sense as a WG in its own right? 
One of the suggestions made at the workshop was to not actually standardize 
a rule or rule exchange language just now but to standardize a substantial 
reusable component such as an expression language.

Received on Thursday, 25 August 2005 13:27:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:33 UTC