Re: Review of XML-Data

Gary,

I made the editorial changes you suggested (see below). Thanx.

Gary Hallmark wrote on 28/09/2009 22:17:49:
> 
> Editorial:
> 
> The 2 phrases "XML document" and "XML data source" are used 
> interchangeably. For concreteness and
> without loss of generality, "XML document" should be used consistently 
> throughout.

Done.

> Definition (Instance of the data model). An instance*s* of the data 
> model (remove the *s*)

Corrected.

> I don't understand the "resp." clause in the following:
> <quote>
> child::[prefix:]NAME, resp. child::schema-element([prefix:]NAME), if 
> the, optional, namespace URI in C' s DM-Name is URI and if the local 
> name is NAME.
> </quote>

I changed the sentence to:
"child::[prefix:]NAME (and child::schema-element([prefix:]NAME), if the 
data model instance that contains e is constructed from a PSVI), if the, 
optional, namespace URI in C' s DM-Name is URI and if the local name is 
NAME."

> spelling: forme (should be form)

Ocrrected.

Cheers,

Christian

ILOG, an IBM Company
9 rue de Verdun
94253 - Gentilly cedex - FRANCE
Tel. +33 1 49 08 35 00
Fax +33 1 49 08 35 10


Sauf indication contraire ci-dessus:/ Unless stated otherwise above:
Compagnie IBM France
Siège Social : Tour Descartes, 2, avenue Gambetta, La Défense 5, 92400 
Courbevoie
RCS Nanterre 552 118 465
Forme Sociale : S.A.S.
Capital Social : 609.751.783,30 ?
SIREN/SIRET : 552 118 465 02430

Received on Wednesday, 30 September 2009 13:42:42 UTC