W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2009

Re: Review of XML-DATA

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 09:01:17 +0100
Message-ID: <4AC1BECD.4040004@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Christian De Sainte Marie <csma@fr.ibm.com>
CC: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>, public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
Hi Christian,

> I corrected  the draft wrt your editorial comments. See my own comments 
> inlined.
> 
> Dave Reynolds wrote on 26/09/2009 14:11:29:
>  >
>  > ** Editorial
>  >
>  > ** Section 1
>  >
>  > [Same hard to parse sentence in para6 that I commented on last time.]
>  > s/Followingly, this/This/
>  > s/possible, the corresponding XML schemas/where available the
>  > corresponding XML schemas,/
> 
> Replaced with:
> "Accordingly, this document specifies how a RIF document is combined 
> with well-formed XML data sources and, where available, the 
> corresponding XML schemas, identified using the <tt>rif:Import</tt> 
> construct."
> 
> Is that any better?

Yes, fine.

>  > Delete para7 ("However, an instance of the data model can be ....")
>  > since the rest of the document has dropped the direct mapping from
>  > relational tables.
> 
> I would prefer not to...
> 
> Precisely because it remains the only place where this possibility is 
> explicitly mentioned, after the relational table part of the example has 
> bee removed.

But since the note doesn't specify how that can be done then mentioning 
it is just a source of confusion. Perhaps an editor's note saying this 
is intended to be supported in a future draft?

Cheers,
Dave
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:02:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 29 September 2009 08:02:25 GMT