W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Proposed: list indexing from 0 "At Risk"

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 08:57:08 +0100
Message-ID: <4AC460D1.1010204@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
CC: "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Sandro Hawke wrote:
> Jim Melton says XQuery is very uncomfortable with RIF Lists being
> indexed from zero [1].  In our telecon, we were pretty unsure about it
> ourselves.  I suggest we mark this At Risk, and see what feedback we
> get.  Please reply and indicate support or objections...


> Also, I see our AtRisk numbering is broken:
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Special:Search?search=atrisk&fulltext=Search
> I see four different items there, and this indexing-from-zero will be a
> fifth if we do it.  Okay for me to renumber them (making Safeness be #4
> instead of a second #2) and make them link to a wiki page listing all of
> them?  (that's what we did with OWL 2.  See, for example,
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/ )


> I look for the chairs to tell me whether we have enough consensus on
> this to publish later today (10/01), or need to wait until next week
> (10/06).

Well there's consensus so far :-)

Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Thursday, 1 October 2009 07:58:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:57 UTC