- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:14:59 +0100
- To: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>, "Public-Rif-Wg (E-mail)" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
On 1 Oct 2009, at 08:57, Dave Reynolds wrote: > Sandro Hawke wrote: >> Jim Melton says XQuery is very uncomfortable with RIF Lists being >> indexed from zero [1]. In our telecon, we were pretty unsure about >> it >> ourselves. I suggest we mark this At Risk, and see what feedback we >> get. Please reply and indicate support or objections... +1 >> Also, I see our AtRisk numbering is broken: >> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Special:Search?search=atrisk&fulltext=Search >> I see four different items there, and this indexing-from-zero will >> be a >> fifth if we do it. Okay for me to renumber them (making Safeness >> be #4 >> instead of a second #2) and make them link to a wiki page listing >> all of >> them? (that's what we did with OWL 2. See, for example, >> http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/CR-owl2-syntax-20090611/ ) +1 > >> I look for the chairs to tell me whether we have enough consensus on >> this to publish later today (10/01), or need to wait until next week >> (10/06). > I see my support is belated, but well, it doesn't change the overall consensus. Axel -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Sunday, 4 October 2009 22:15:34 UTC