Re: [RIF] XML syntax for lists

I can't quite figure out who is taking which side, or even if there is a
disagreement, but...

> > >     <List>
> > >       [ <elements rif:ordered="yes">
> > >            TERM+
> > >         </elements>
> > >         <rest> TERM </rest>?
> > >       ]?
> > >    </List>
> > > Example 2.2.
> > > <List>
> > >  <elements rif:ordered="yes">
> > >     <Const type="xsd:string> New </Const>
> > >     <Const type="xsd:string> Bronze </Const>
> > >     <Const type="xsd:string> Silver </Const>
> > >     <Const type="xsd:string> Gold </Const>
> > >  </elements>
> > > </List>

looks about right to me.  +1 to that design. 

(But I haven't seen the alternatives that might have been suggested.)

      -- Sandro

Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 15:26:18 UTC