W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2009

Re: [RIF] question about a few of your test cases

From: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 23:49:29 +0200
Message-Id: <F364AE8C-1C9E-4A65-A7D9-261E92AFCC47@inf.unibz.it>
To: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
Cc: RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

>
> In yesterday's telecon, we reviewed previously approved test cases in
> light of the most recent specs, and agreed that [1] is obsolete but
> think that [2] is still valid. Could you verify that?

Correct.


>
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Annotation_Entailment
> [2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Non-Annotation_Entailment
>
> Also, in these proposed tests, did you intend to use an import profile
> of Simple in [3], so that it is the same as the profile used in [4],
> and doesn't distract from the main point of this pair of tests?

Yes.

Cheers, Jos

>
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_5
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_6
>
> Stella
Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:50:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:50:22 GMT