W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2009

[RIF] question about a few of your test cases

From: Stella Mitchell <stellamit@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:20:02 -0400
Message-ID: <d64b0f2c0906241420k555ca0e9j179a7422fb66b0d8@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jos de Bruijn <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, RIF <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi Jos,

In yesterday's telecon, we reviewed previously approved test cases in
light of the most recent specs, and agreed that [1] is obsolete but
think that [2] is still valid. Could you verify that?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Annotation_Entailment
[2] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/Non-Annotation_Entailment

Also, in these proposed tests, did you intend to use an import profile
of Simple in [3], so that it is the same as the profile used in [4],
and doesn't distract from the main point of this pair of tests?

[3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_5
[4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/RDF_Combination_SubClass_6

Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 21:20:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:47:56 UTC