W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > September 2008

Re: [RIF-APS] Rules Sign

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 12:24:35 -0400
To: "Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr>
Cc: "Chris Welty" <cawelty@gmail.com>, "Jos de Bruijn" <debruijn@inf.unibz.it>, "Adrian Paschke" <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>, <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080904122435.4a76987b@kiferserv>

Patrick, you are thinking procedurally, while we are talking about *logic*.

michael


On Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:54:06 +0200
"Patrick Albert" <palbert@ilog.fr> wrote:

> CSMA's proposal might not fit the current use of frames in PRD, but it
> relies on the fact that almost ALL modern production systems make the
> distinction between attributes of objects that refer to ONE ATOMIC value
> -- such as one Person's age -- and attributes of objects that refer A
> SET of values -- such as one Person's parents. In this case the rules
> might propose some syntax to refer the set as a value and some syntax to
> iterate across the elements of the set.
Received on Thursday, 4 September 2008 16:26:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:54 GMT