Michael Kifer wrote: > > On Tue, 02 Sep 2008 16:39:36 +0200 > Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote: > > >>Why not use = for frames instead, as in obj[prop = val]? >> >>As I suggested on IRC during last week's telecon, that would reflect the >>semantics that the frame is true iff the value of property 'prop' for object >>'obj' is equal to 'val'. > > > Such a frame is true NOT if the value is equal to val, but if the value of prop > CONTAINS val. Right. I forgot that. But my point about making it extensible to using other tests than equality remains. ChristianReceived on Tuesday, 2 September 2008 16:45:06 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:54 GMT