- From: Hassan Aït-Kaci <hak@ilog.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 13:00:31 +0200
- To: W3C RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Hi,
Unfortunately, I cannot attend the session on XML tagging.
Here are my comments and questions:
(1) Whether we decide to use entities (i.e., &rif;iri) or namespaces
(i.e., rif:iri), we need to be consistent. Most examples in the
current various RIF documents are inconsistent.
(2) In each case, we need to come up with the actual entities or IRIs
that these stand for. [My concerns are simply to know what to do in
order to build a RIF XML serializer for BLD or PRD.]
(3) The XM serialization rules in the current BLD document do no seem to
be consistent with the new grammar (but since the latter in bound to
change after this F2F, I understand that this can wait).
Thanks.
-hak
--
Hassan Aït-Kaci * ILOG, Inc. - Product Division R&D
http://koala.ilog.fr/wiki/bin/view/Main/HassanAitKaci
Received on Tuesday, 27 May 2008 11:00:50 UTC