W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > May 2008

SWC Appendix 6.2

From: Dave Reynolds <der@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Sun, 25 May 2008 21:51:48 +0100
Message-ID: <4839D164.4070700@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
To: RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

I hesitate to suggest this given how much work has gone into it but I 
wonder if we should drop section 6.2 of SWC?

The OWL working group is developing an OWL-R fragment which is 
implementable using rules and will presumably have normative status. It 
is potentially confusing to have RIF generate an Informative OWL DLP 
embedding which is similar but not identical.

Thoughts?

Dave
-- 
Hewlett-Packard Limited
Registered Office: Cain Road, Bracknell, Berks RG12 1HN
Registered No: 690597 England
Received on Sunday, 25 May 2008 20:52:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT