Re: SWC Appendix 6.2

> I hesitate to suggest this given how much work has gone into it but I 
> wonder if we should drop section 6.2 of SWC?

I personally would not mind dropping the section, but it does make the 
document more "complete".

> The OWL working group is developing an OWL-R fragment which is 
> implementable using rules and will presumably have normative status. It 
> is potentially confusing to have RIF generate an Informative OWL DLP 
> embedding which is similar but not identical.

Well, this is OWL 1.0 DLP, whereas the OWL WG is working on OWL 2.0.
But I see your point about the confusion.


Best, Jos

> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Dave

-- 
                          debruijn@inf.unibz.it

Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
   -- George Bernard Shaw