W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > March 2008

AW: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon March 11

From: Adrian Paschke <adrian.paschke@biotec.tu-dresden.de>
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 10:36:42 +0100
To: "'Christian de Sainte Marie'" <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: "'RIF WG'" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20080311093636.8153C7000B64@mailserver.biotec.tu-dresden.de>



Hi Christian,

Unfortunately regrets due to a conflicting meeting.

I have updated the UCR document and it is ready for review:

http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/UCR

Regarding XBRL liaison, I'm awaiting an answer from Eric Cohen (see attached
eMail) and I'm in contact with another XBRL guy at MIT.


Best,

Adrian

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Eric Cohen [mailto:xbrlguru@gmail.com] 
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. März 2008 07:20
An: Adrian Paschke
Betreff: Re: XBRL - W3C RIF Liaison

Thank you for reaching out. I am working on two things as part of
responding to your message.

1. On February 8, the leadership of XBRL met with W3C leadership for
the first time to discuss whether and how to work more closely
together on a formal basis. One of the issues was how XBRL can provide
resources for opportunities such as the one you have offered. I am
checking to see if the "official" channels have been developed, and
will let you know how to tap into that.

2. If that is not yet prepared, I am working to identify other
knowledgeable resources to take part.

Should you have any general questions or burning issues that need to
be handled quickly, I will be glad to handle them

I hope to get to you soon on 1. or 2. - feel free to contact me as you wish.

Thank you for reaching out.

<eccn />

Eric E. Cohen
eric.e.cohen@us.pwc.com


-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org [mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org] Im
Auftrag von Jos de Bruijn
Gesendet: Montag, 10. März 2008 19:12
An: Christian de Sainte Marie
Cc: RIF WG
Betreff: Re: [Admin] Agenda for RIF telecon March 11

Could we also briefly discuss my proposal concerning the appendix of the 
swc document as working group note [1]?

Best, Jos

[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Mar/0036.html

Christian de Sainte Marie wrote:
> 
> AGENDA Teleconference
> W3C Rules Interchange Format (RIF) Working Group
> 11 March 2008
> 
> *ATTENTION:* USA changed to summer time on March 9; Europe will change
> on March 30 => In the meantime (that is, on March 11, 18, 25) telecon
> time is 1500 UTC, that is 4pm CET (3pm London).
> 
> North America in the *SUMMER* time:
> *1500* UTC, 0800 (West US) 1100 (East US) *1500* (London) *1600* (Paris)
> 
> Duration: *90 min*
> 
> *Agenda summary*
> 1. Admin (5 mn)
>  PROPOSED: accept minutes of F2F9 [1]
> 2. F2F10 [2] (5mn)
> 3. Action review [3] (5 min)
> 4. Liaison (5 mn)
> 5. Issue 40 (builtins) [4] (5 mn)
>  PROPOSED: BLD builtins are not sensitive to order as they are in query
> languages and production rules (closing issue-40).
> 6. Action 404 (update lists syntax+semantics) [5] (10 mn)
>  PROPOSED: Approve Michael's alternative proposal on lists [6] and
> update FLD+BLD syntax/semantics accordingly to reflect that and the
> previous resolution on lists
> 7. BLD [7] (30 mn)
>  * syntax for meta-data in BLD WD2
>  * XML syntax for BLD WD2
> 8. Publication plan (25 mn)
>  * review changes in FLD, BLD and UCR before freeze
> 9. AOB
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/F2F9_Minutes
> [2]  http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/F2F10
> [3] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/open
> [4] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/40
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/actions/404
> [6] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/Core/List_Constructor-alt
> [7] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD
> [8] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Jan/0105.html
> [9] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Feb/0133.html 
> (and following thread)
> [10] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rif-wg/2008Mar/0029.html
> [11] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/BLD#Appendix:_XML_Schema_for_BLD
> [12] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/FLD
> [13] http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/UCR
> 
> -------------------
> 
> *Detailed agenda*
> 
> Bridge: +1.617.761.6200 (US) or +33 4 89 06 34 99 (France)
> Conference code: 74394# ('RIFWG')
> IRC Chat: irc:irc.w3.org (port 6665), #rif
> Web-based IRC (member-only): [http://www.w3.org/2001/01/cgi-irc]
> 
> *PLEASE POST REGRETS* TO
[http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wiki/TeleconRegrets]
> 
> Chair: Chris Welty
> Scribe: TBD
> See Scribes List [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/ScribesList]
> 
> Please note that RIF WG telecons are for attendance only by Working
> Group Participants and guests invited by the chairs.
> 
> 1. ADMIN (5 min)
> 
> - Roll call (please read before telecon the following)
> RIF Regrets Policy:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/RegretsPolicy]
> Using Zakim:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/UsingZakim]
> Telecon Etiquette:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/wiki/TeleconEtiquette]
> Action/Issues Tracker:
> [http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/]
> 
> - Agenda amendments
> 
> PROPOSED: accept minutes of F2F9 [1]
> 
> 2. F2F10 (5mn)
> 
>  * Updates on F2F10 [2]
> 
> 3. Actions review (5 min)
> 
> - Review actions [3]
> 
> 4. Liaison (5 min)
> 
> - Review active liaisons:
> XQuery, XPath (W3C) - Massimo Marchiori
> Common Logic (ISO) - Bill Andersen & Chris Menzel
> PRR (OMG) - Paul Vincent
> SBVR (OMG) - Donald Chapin
> ODM (OMG) - Elisa Kendall, Evan Wallace
> OWL (W3C) - Sandro Hawke
> 
> - OWL
> 
> - XBRL
> 
> 5. Issue 40 (builtins) (5 mn)
> 
> - Close issue 40 (builtins) [4]
> 
> PROPOSED: BLD builtins are not sensitive to order as they are in query
> languages and production rules (closing issue-40).
> 
> 6. Action 404 (update lists syntax+semantics) (10 mn)
> 
> - Discuss (and hoepfully: close) action 404 (update lists 
> syntax+semantics in FLD-BLD) [5]
> 
> PROPOSED: Approve Michael's alternative proposal on lists [6] and
> update FLD+BLD syntax/semantics accordingly to reflect that and the
> previous resolution on lists.
> 
> 7. BLD [7] (30 mn)
> 
> - discuss syntax for meta-data in BLD WD2 (see Jos's initial proposal on 
> metadata [8], proposed update for FLD/BLD syntax [9], and Michael's 
> proposal [10]
> 
>  NB: The consensus at F2F9 seemed to be that metadata was 
> non-controversial and could included in BLD WD2, but that so-called 
> directives and metadatastatements required more discussion and would not 
> be in BLD WD2
> 
>  => The *focus of the dicussion* is on what do we include in BLD WD2
> 
> - discuss XML syntax for BLD WD2 [11], [10]
> 
> 8. Publication plan (25 mn)
> 
> - review changes in FLD [12], BLD [7] and UCR [13] before freeze
> 
> 9. AOB
> 
> - Pick scribe for next telecon
> 
> - Next meeting: March 18 (*ATTENTION:* one hour earlier than usual in 
> Europe (1500 UTC; 4pm CET)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
                          debruijn@inf.unibz.it

Jos de Bruijn,        http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
One man that has a mind and knows it can
always beat ten men who haven't and don't.
   -- George Bernard Shaw
Received on Tuesday, 11 March 2008 09:37:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:47 GMT