> 2. General syntax and semantics of builtins (as opposed to the particulars > of each builtin). I have not incorporated it into the document yet. > > This is probably not on a critical path to a publication of the next > draft. The DTB doc, which goes with this, is not yet ready anyway. I think it would be good to at least have the syntax and semantics of built-ins. Otherwise, it might seem like not much has happened in the BLD language since the last working draft. > 4. XML. > > People were unhappy with the degree of formality with which XML was > specified. There is also no XML for FLD. > > The second issue is not a show-stopper for the publication, but the > first depends on how violently people object. I would not violently object at this point, but I have the feeling that we will need a couple of iterations before we get the XML specification right. Best, Jos > > > > > --michael > -- debruijn@inf.unibz.it Jos de Bruijn, http://www.debruijn.net/ ---------------------------------------------- One man that has a mind and knows it can always beat ten men who haven't and don't. -- George Bernard Shaw
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:47 GMT