W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: [PRD] ACTION-531 Update PRD examples complete

From: Michael Kifer <kifer@cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 14:15:24 -0400
To: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Cc: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080623141524.22883e04@kiferdesk>



On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:27 +0200
Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:

> 
> Michael Kifer wrote:
> > Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:
> > 
> >>For the avoidance of doubt: I absolutely support that the 
> >>interoperability between PRD and BLD should be maximal. But I see this 
> >>as an XML syntax and a semantics related question; not a PS related one.
> > 
> > We should strive to be compatible at all levels. No need for
> > gratuitous incompatibilities.
> 
> Bis repetita supposedly placet, so let me write it again: having a 
> different PS for a different target audience is not a gratuitous 
> difference. Especially since BLD PS has been designed without being 
> reused for PRD in mind.

Everyone had an opportunity to suggest changes and improvements to the BLD
syntax. In particular, the group has adopted several of your suggestions.
So, saying that the BLD PS "has been designed without being reused for PRD in
mind" is inaccurate.

It is also hard to fail to notice that the original call to you to be
compatible at the PS level came from PR people.


	--michael  
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 18:16:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT