W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: [PRD] ACTION-531 Update PRD examples complete

From: Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 20:07:27 +0200
Message-ID: <485FE65F.8070901@ilog.fr>
To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
CC: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>, RIF WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Michael Kifer wrote:
> Christian de Sainte Marie <csma@ilog.fr> wrote:
> 
>>For the avoidance of doubt: I absolutely support that the 
>>interoperability between PRD and BLD should be maximal. But I see this 
>>as an XML syntax and a semantics related question; not a PS related one.
> 
> We should strive to be compatible at all levels. No need for
> gratuitous incompatibilities.

Bis repetita supposedly placet, so let me write it again: having a 
different PS for a different target audience is not a gratuitous 
difference. Especially since BLD PS has been designed without being 
reused for PRD in mind.

Cheers,

Christian
Received on Monday, 23 June 2008 18:08:01 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT