W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

RE: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ]

From: Paul Vincent <pvincent@tibco.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 09:04:02 -0700
Message-ID: <637B7E7B51291C48838F5AE1F2ACA1D714D11E@NA-PA-VBE02.na.tibco.com>
To: "Rule Interchange Format Working Group WG" <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

Probably yes, to be PRR compatible and for systems which model rulesets
as functionals (/services).

Paul Vincent
TIBCO | Business Optimization | Business Rules & CEP
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-rif-wg-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-rif-wg-request@w3.org]
> On Behalf Of Rule Interchange Format Working Group Issue Tracker
> Sent: 20 June 2008 16:18
> To: public-rif-wg@w3.org
> Subject: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset
> construct? [PRD ]
> 
> 
> 
> ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct?
[PRD
> ]
> 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/
> 
> Raised by: Christian de Sainte Marie
> On product: PRD
> 
> Should PRD specify a Ruleset construct, distinct from the Group? If
yes:
> for what purpose (e.g. parameters)?
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 20 June 2008 16:04:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT