W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > June 2008

Re: ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ]

From: Gary Hallmark <gary.hallmark@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 22:06:54 -0700
Message-ID: <486080EE.8060803@oracle.com>
To: Rule Interchange Format Working Group WG <public-rif-wg@w3.org>

You should answer the "For what purpose" question first.  Where BLD and 
PRD overlap in semantics, they must also overlap in syntax.  So some PRD 
rules will share the Ruleset construct with BLD, of that you can be certain.

Rule Interchange Format Working Group Issue Tracker wrote:
> ISSUE-63 (PRD Ruleset): Should PRD have a specific Ruleset construct? [PRD ]
>
> http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/track/issues/
>
> Raised by: Christian de Sainte Marie
> On product: PRD 
>
> Should PRD specify a Ruleset construct, distinct from the Group? If yes: for what purpose (e.g. parameters)?
>
>
>
>   
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2008 05:10:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:49 GMT