Re: new drafts

I looked at the frozen draft of BLD of July 28 and there is still 
something fishy.

The listing in section 6.1 does not include item 4

Best, Jos

Sandro Hawke wrote:
>> I went through this in bld and made sure that all text inside ul/ol is also
>> inside the li-tags.
>> Can u check if this fixes the html in the output version?
> 
> It does appear to fix the HTML lists.
> 
> I did a new round of drafts.  (July 28).
> 
> BLD (along with FLD and UCR) still has many HTML validation errors,
> though.  Add ",validate" to the URL to see the errors...
> 
> How are the ,checklinks reports coming? 
> 
>       -- Sandro
> 
>> michael
>>
>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 11:28:13 -0400
>> Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>
>>>> The numbering seems ok in the wiki.
>>> That depends on your browser.  Since the page is invalid (not
>>> well-formed) HTML, its meaning/rendering is not defined by the specs.
>>> Different software handles the situation differently.
>>>
>>> The W3C publication rules require that all publications be valid HTML,
>>> so my toolchain runs "tidy" [1] which tries to repair any invalid HTML.
>>> In this case, its repair algorithm does not do what we'd like.  But, of
>>> course, the solution is to fix the wiki page.
>>>
>>> In this case, it looks to me like there is content inside lists
>>> (<ol>...</ol>) which is not inside list-items tags (<li>...</li>).
>>> That should never be the case.
>>>
>>>      -- Sandro
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] http://tidy.sourceforge.net/
>>>
>>>> Maybe it is a problem with the html conversion tool?
>>>>
>>>> michael
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:15:04 -0400
>>>> Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a new set of snapshots of all six documents, slated for
>>>>> publication next week, linked from the WG homepage.
>>>>>
>>>>> (BLD still has some invalid HTML, of which one symptom is the broken
>>>>> numbering in section 6.1.)
>>>>>
>>>>>     -- Sandro
>>>>>
>>>>>
> 

-- 
Jos de Bruijn            debruijn@inf.unibz.it
+390471016224         http://www.debruijn.net/
----------------------------------------------
No one who cannot rejoice in the discovery of
his own mistakes deserves to be called a
scholar.
   - Donald Foster

Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 08:18:46 UTC