On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:15:02 -0400 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > Not sure what you mean. I ran checklinks on the Jul 28 frozen draft of > > BLD and got no broken links. > > When I visit > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080728/,checklinks > > I get: Looks like it timed out before finishing. Anyway, I fixed a few errors. Some other complaints seem to be invalid, as they are not intended to be links. I also had to fix some anchors in DTB, but I did not check the rest in DTB. > The validator should never give a blank page. When I go to > > http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080728/,validate > > I get one validation error, pointing out that > "def-bld-semantic-multistruct" is an id used twice. Again, was a timeout from W3, most likely. I fixed this error. I also fixed HTML in FLD and a few links. But other complaints about the links seem invalid. For instance, why is it complaining about "abstract"? Likewise, about the rif and string fragments? --michaelReceived on Monday, 28 July 2008 21:02:18 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:52 GMT