W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rif-wg@w3.org > July 2008

Re: checklinks

From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:15:02 -0400
To: kifer@cs.sunysb.edu
Cc: public-rif-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <19974.1217276102@ubuhebe>

> Not sure what you mean. I ran checklinks on the Jul 28 frozen draft of
> BLD and got no broken links.  

When I visit 

   http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080728/,checklinks

I get:


= http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080728/
=     What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed.
=     Response status code: 200
=     Response message: OK
=     Lines: 181, 230, 284, 285, 288, 290, 291, 292, 294, 296, 299, 301,
=     307, 310, 312, 314, 316, 318, 320, 324, 327, 329, 331, 335, 337,
=     339, 345, 347, 351, 355, 358, 361, 365, 366, 368, 370, 374, 377,
=     379, 383, 402, 404, 405, 406, 407, 416, 422, 425, 435, 478, 480,
=     489, 490, 492, 527, 743, 752, 760, 770, 833, 885, 915, 922, 932,
=     962, 968, 1038, 1041, 1054, 1062, 1066, 1080, 1116, 1154, 1176,
=     1181, 1194, 1275, 1281, 1293, 1295, 1318, 1414, 1424, 1441, 1450,
=     1460, 1512, 1521, 1765, 1790, 1860, 1863, 1876, 1883, 1884, 1886,
=     1889, 1892, 1896, 1901, 1909, 1946, 2109, 2111, 2115, 2133, 2385,
=     2648, 2663, 2666, 2761, 2762, 3007, 3009, 3042, 3053, 3070, 3094,
=     3097, 3113, 3115, 3251, 3308, 3312, 3328, 3373, 3375, 3377, 3395,
=     3414, 3419, 3430, 3434, 3436, 3450, 3454 
= 
=     Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
=         sec-translation-rule-language: 2762
=         sec-fld-semantic-framework: 3375 
= 
= http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-dtb-20080728/
=     What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed.
=     Response status code: 200
=     Response message: OK
=     Lines: 238, 491, 526, 742, 752, 810, 817, 921, 931, 945, 1037,
=     1195, 1281, 1318, 1440, 1505, 1511, 1520, 1660, 1755, 1793, 3193,
=     3195, 3196, 3298, 3307, 3394, 3407, 3513, 3514  
= 
=     Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
=         app-external-schema: 931 
= 
= http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/
=     What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed.
=     Response status code: 200
=     Response message: OK
=     Lines: 832, 3597, 3598
= 
=     Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
=         Annotations%7C: 832 
= 
= http://www.w3.org/2007/rif
=     What to do: There are broken fragments which must be fixed.
=     Response status code: 200
=     Response message: OK
=     Lines: 3650, 3651, 4002, 4014, 4015
= 
=     Broken fragments and their line numbers: They need to be fixed!
=         iri: 4002 

The last of these can be ignored.

> Also, ,validate gave me a blank page after a while. Does it mean that HTML is
> fine?

The validator should never give a blank page.   When I go to

http://www.w3.org/2005/rules/wg/draft/ED-rif-bld-20080728/,validate

I get one validation error, pointing out that
"def-bld-semantic-multistruct" is an id used twice.

     -- Sandro
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 20:15:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:52 GMT