The numbering seems ok in the wiki. Maybe it is a problem with the html conversion tool? michael On Wed, 23 Jul 2008 10:15:04 -0400 Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org> wrote: > > > There's a new set of snapshots of all six documents, slated for > publication next week, linked from the WG homepage. > > (BLD still has some invalid HTML, of which one symptom is the broken > numbering in section 6.1.) > > -- Sandro > >Received on Wednesday, 23 July 2008 14:52:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:33:52 GMT